was held last Friday, March 4 meeting of the Making Legnano.Nel course of the meeting were discussed three main points, the status of the initiatives envisaged for the Festival of Unity ' Italy, the situation of the cuts in the Park Altomilanese, the future development for the Association's activities. This will be quick guide on the Internet, open to any additions by attending the meeting, and comments of those who would say its about ..
Making Legnano addressed constructively critical but I think what has been programmed for the Unity Day of Italy, are known to be associated with situations that still refer to the reading of these pieces *.
I assume detectable in both the above articles, I personally and as an Association we are disappointed for what is proposed by the Administration and the ways that have generated the program in Legnano becomes known only a handful of days before the date fixed.
In other places it is debated whether recurrence represents a March 17 hearing by the population do not intend to go into the pros and cons that do exist.
I think it is obvious how to celebrate the Risorgimento through (for better or for worse) the choice of an event to remember, has had strong opponents and opposition agreed to the boycott.
A Legnano we were within walking distance of the festivities without knowing what exactly is organized by the owners to do so, since 2007 the existence of an ad hoc committee whose nature and whose way of act little (or maybe nothing) you know, ultimately involving the city's zero.
On this last point that of participation, we stress, as usual, Vitali (and who is for it) makes, disposes, and when I do see is disturbing arrabbia.Perché maneuver with requests for information, worse criticism is never welcome.
back to us to fetch wood, we have tried to help in engaging in a collective discourse some associations because there was a lowest common denominator in program initiatives without undermining the autonomy of each project, tracing what happened on the occasion of the referendum on the water.
The responses were disheartening.
Each association has in fact acted independently and fortunately there are initiatives, and for most of quality, but ... ... there is a but ....
This will just lose the opportunity to open a collective discourse (per unit, as it happens) and visible to many citizens that we hope will crowd the streets during the "White Night", 16, of provide them with a characteristic time in which he stressed as the Renaissance was culturally constructed on events that have little to do with a gala and have different quality compared to even the affectation of dignity Carroccio, indeed almost unique cultural activities for which the City has committed when more local visibility.
take note of this act associate each pro domo sua.E in the discussion that we evaluated were not able to act as a catalyst in this attempt to fall back on alternative possibilities.
Jumping Stake in bush, as is the case, to quote the argument, we keeping an eye on the situation of cutting trees within the PAM.
currently do not have precise answers from different respondents. He stressed that the topic of management of the parks we are particularly interested, and then we're looking through the responses of the bodies and we have already contacted the machine acts as protection and land management recommendations to the public.
On the sidelines of these discussions has been introduced the topic on the future activities of the association in
perspective Assembly next April, as a statute will have to decide what "to do" in the future.
And as the current situation, with lack of implementation (albeit partial) of the targets is not excluded a priori to deliver on that occasion for posterity MP fetch wood.
* Clicking on each of the individual words will open its links
0 comments:
Post a Comment