 |
| As in this photo of WFP. Lights and Shadows in 2010 |
D Escriva in two lines the environmental balance of the year just ended cronaca.Mi a stepping stone to what the press has already been the subject of current By repeating the arguments that led to last December 30 WWF Italy in 2010 to define the past, a bad year for the beautiful country with regard to the environmental balance.
the site of association with the Panda in the symbol you can read the reasons that led to this assessment and refer to them for information complete, the link is this address.
My personal interest in bringing back a summary of these evaluations is to expose a general framework (which by the profane, in essence,) which try to include in a future post, some considerations on the management of ' environment in this area.
At the local level in several already published in this blog post and in to fetch wood you can imagine some topics that I am / we are critici.Ne alcuni.Iniziando list of routes of a PGT in Legnano, which is now yet another layer of cement have little incentive to come, or the protection of the territory is neglected against vandals who for supervision and intervention situations, see the modus operandi with which the forest Ronchi, we proceeded to grub up a slice of green a few days ago, continuing with the Agenda 21 from 2007 block of situations ... small, representing the litmus test of a concrete and more uncomfortable, I think interest is only a fraction of our citizens.
But as I wrote above there will be time and opportunity to deepen the local list. Now, back to the WWF report, I can find a similar "list" of situations
which is opposed to the thumb of the environmental bet against almost all items related the protection and management of the environment in the Bel Paese.
Beginning last item of the report: in which the body responsible for the Environment, the Ministry for the note, is defined in a tragic situation because of a cut in three years of 2 / 3 of funds intended for this office, no money * and ability to affect reduced accordingly.
Interesting read between the lines as the Italy site and the infrastructure that is blocked by appeals that are not attributable to environmental organizations, viewed by many Italians as the antithesis of the "politics of" so fashionable and affecting only the 8, 1% of disputes in place, the responsibilities of many delays are to be found elsewhere, according to the documento.Aggiungo I realize many of the merits of the works and the real potential to affect emissions in the fight against pollution and there is little to say, when roads are built almost exclusively .
In Italy the use of the land remains unstoppable in 2010, two million of agricultural land, are gone, eaten up by concrete, but the disappearance of an area almost the size of the Lazio and Abruzzo (although it is not closely related, specific that the approach is mine and not the work of WWF) does not generate even a penny more to be allocated to the prevention of landslide risk .**
Energetically criticality is linked to the return of nuclear power in this course of action, however, discourages any form of growth of alternative energies and actions to savings and efficiency energetica.E on this point given the number of references in blog fly.
In the field of protection of nature in 2010 records a serious crisis in the parks, in a context where the hunting lobby are found primarily in a regional context incomprehensible according to the WWF (which is not unbalanced, but very understandable to the signed) edge to their demands. Policies of conservation, the 2010 records the most serious case of downgrading Stelvio National Park, established back in 1935, which could become a dangerous precedent at the national level that can destabilize the already difficult relations between State, Regions and local authorities.
of all the above and more-than-synthesized no-carry are the official documents can be found in http://www.wwf.it/UserFiles/File/News% 20Dossier %% 20years% 20of% 20Appti/DOSSIER/2010_UN 20AMBIENTE.pdf
* As reported by WWF: from € 1.5 billion allocated by the Finance Act 2008, to € 554 million today.
** Equally as above: The resource allocation specifically earmarked for the River Basin Authority and ground defense operations in 2010 amounted to only € 32.7 million and are in a fund's budget is absolutely laughable
0 comments:
Post a Comment